LNG Risk Management

Managing the risks of onshore and offshore LNG facilities via a thorough understanding of the design and key issues associated with liquefied natural gas.

Our multifaceted approach takes into consideration the needs of regulators, engineering contractors and most importantly, you. LNG terminals, send-out facilities and associated pipelines, and power plants around the world rely on our extensive experience to complete QRAs, HAZOP and hazard identification studies, safety integrity level (SIL) reviews, and consequence analysis modeling.

Learn More

Have a Question on LNG Risk Management?

Contact Us

Our Team

Daniel Nguyen, PE & PMP

Senior Partner & CTO

Mr. Nguyen leads the development of ioMosaic’s Process Safety Office® software, a technical calculation tool used by engineers and risk analysts to calculate and assess hazards and risks. He is responsible for a team of software engineers creating and improving the many integrated components of Process Safety Office®, which include SuperChems™ and PHAGlobal®.

In addition to his responsibilities as CTO, Mr. Nguyen also manages pressure relief and flare systems evaluation and design projects for petrochemical, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries. Along with large and complex pressure relief and effluent handling systems projects, Mr. Nguyen has conducted dozens of consequence analysis and quantitative risk analysis (QRA) studies involving a wide range of flammable materials. He is fluent in English and Vietnamese.

His extensive process safety presentation experience includes topics such as vibration-induced fatigue, managing complex pressure relief and flare systems projects, and SuperChems™ training and updates.

Education

Project Management Professional (PMP)

Professional Engineer (PE), Texas

Professional Engineer (PE), Massachusetts

Tufts University 
M.S. Chemical Engineering

Tufts University 
B.S. (Magna Cum Laude) Chemical Engineering

Featured Videos

Featured Case Studies

Process Safety Management Quality Audits

Companies have implemented their process safety management programs to comply with OSHA and EPA requirements, but they continue to have accidents. Process safety management programs can meet the letter of the law, but may not be effective in preventing accidents. Traditional audit programs look at documentation and procedures, but do little to evaluate the program quality or effectiveness.

View Case Study

An international consumer products manufacturer suffered a significant business interruption due to failure of a critical support facility. This incident raised the question of whether there were other critical support facilities that could cause a similar interruption in production or a significant safety or environmental impact.

Read more...

The California Energy Commission had been directed to assist in the development of clean alternate transportation fuels. As part of this effort they are supporting the commercialization of fuel cell vehicles operating on hydrogen fuel. In order to be used extensively in the transportation sector, the safety of hydrogen production, storage, and supply needs to be addressed.

Read more...
A multinational energy company wanted to complete an evaluation of a PRV system in order to comply with the PSM standard OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119 which requires that employers compile information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including relief system design and design basis. 
Read more...

Featured Resources

Latest News