SuperChems™ X New Interface

Easier to Access, Understand, and Use

The new graphical interface is now both interactive and responsive. Easily toggle the visibility of each selection, 'expanding' or 'collapsing' the content associated with the workspace. Consequence models and explosions, fire and dispersion calculations interface elements are now easier to access, understand, and use.

Request A Demo

Want A Demo of SuperChems™ - the Software for PRFS Evaluation and Design?

Request Your Demo

 

SuperChems X Coming Soon

X marks the spot! Process Safety Office® SuperChems™ v10.0 is filled with compelling advancements:

 

Optimized the user experience, resulting in better usability and shorter calculation times.

Streamlined the graphical interface so it is both interactive and responsive, leveraging the latest technology.

Reduced the number of steps and time it takes to accomplish tasks.

All flow and network models completed. Cyclone separator control model added.

New properties features added: Vapor liquid equilibrium and bash queue.

Added a new unit system, improved the PRV object and the compressor performance, enhanced the two-phase/universal vessel model, as well as reactions handling, enabling you to achieve even more proficiency.

Complete pressure relief and flare system (PRFS) and consequence analysis capabilities, fully integrating with the backend engine.

More dispersion (indoor) and explosion models (deflagration) added.

Upgraded help structure, incorporating the National Board Pressure Relief Device Certification NB-18 and common vendor PRV data.

Enhanced and optimized the software engine, improving its speed and accuracy.

Consequence models and explosions, fire and dispersion calculations interface elements are now easier to access, understand, and use.

Integrated reporting functionality, delivering streamlined reports and enhanced readability.

 

Featured Videos

SuperChems™ Intro

SuperChems helps process safety and risk engineers overcome the shortcomings of simple relief design techniques which can often lead to over-design, and more importantly, sometimes leading to under-design.

Download the Flyer

Featured Resources

 

Realize Better Risk Characterization of STHE Tube Failure Scenarios Through Relief Systems Dynamics Modeling

A Risk-Based Approach

Can rapid identification, screening, and ranking of STHE shell failure risks be performed? This paper demonstrates a systematic work process and methodology to evaluate the risks of potential STHE shell failure when subjected to pressures and loads from a sudden tube rupture.

Read the White Paper

Featured Case Studies

 

Complex Flare Network Analysis for Oil Refinery Unit

A large oil refinery with a very complex flare network had become so complex that the tools the refinery was using to evaluate the flows through the flare network could not adequately model the system. The facility had six separate flares, three main headers, and hundreds of relief devices that discharged into the system. As the flare system was modified over the years, multiple cross-connection points were added between the headers in an effort to balance the flow rates through the headers with minimal piping changes.

View Case Study
A polystyrene production facility wanted a complete audit of all pressure relief valve files and documents to determine and process safety information gaps. Requirements included analyzing a third-party contractor’s evaluation of specific vessels that did not have a relief device installed on them, and a pressure relief and flare system design evaluation on the relief devices at the facility.
Read more...
A client needed to update a prior QRA study from 2015 of their plant with more equipment and buildings. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119 PSM requires, under the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) element, that employers conduct a facility siting study to verify that the location and occupancy of buildings, control rooms and trailers have been properly evaluated.
Read more...

The client was storing reactive materials in vessels that could be subject to fire exposure. They wanted to be sure that the relief protection on the vessels was correctly sized, or if not, what changes were necessary for an effective relief system.

Read more...

Latest News